Legal Opinion

Frommel & Brother v. Cox

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1924No. 3960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

1. The court did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the petition.

2. The suit was not barred by laches nor by the statute of limitations.

(а) The running of the statute of limitations was tolled by the pendency of a former suit.(b) Where a suit has been dismissed by the plaintiff, in order to bring a second suit for the same cause of action the plaintiff must pay the costs or file a pauper’s affidavit showing inability to do so. A failure in this regard furnishes ground .for a plea in abatement. White v. Bryant, 136 Ga. 423 (71 S. E. 677); Wright v. Jett, 120 Ga. 995 (48 S. E. 345).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. JettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Jackson v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. White v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sikes v. SeckingerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Brinson v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  3. Simmons Hardware Co. v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  4. Barron v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. Stinson v. BeananSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API