Legal Opinion

Alexander v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 156, Calendar No. 36,346PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant, by condemnation proceedings, acquired the whole of a certain lot for the purpose of opening and widening an avenue. It used only part of the lot for such purpose, leaving unused a five-foot strip between the street and plaintiffs' property. It levied special paving and sidewalk taxes, itself paid the assessment on the five-foot strip and assessed plaintiffs as owners abutting the street. Plaintiffs brought this suit to set aside the assessment, restrain its collection, and for other relief appropriate thereto, and had decree.

The case is ruled by Panfil v. City of Detroit, 246 Mich.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Panfil v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marqua v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Vetal v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API