Legal Opinion

State v. Mumford

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 1905No. 14,196PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Elk district court; Granville P. Aikman, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

William R. Smith, J. :

The appellant, W. A. Mumford, with one Tom Scott, was convicted of stealing a steer, the property of G. W. Parish. The appeal of Scott was dismissed. (The State v. Scott, ante, p. 692, 79 Pac. 126.)

The information charged that on or about December 30, 1903, the defendants, Scott and Mumford, “did unlawfully and feloniously steal, take and carry away one head of neat cattle, to wit, a steer about three years old, and a more particular description of which the informant was not then able to give.” The first point raised is that this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HunterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. State v. SegermondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KagiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API