Legal Opinion

Essick v. Bauman Iron Works

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County

Decided March 9, 1936No. 1755Published

1Opinion of the Court

Shanaman, J.,

The receiver of the Bauman Iron Works filed his first and partial account, which was referred to Abraham H. Rothermel, Esq., for audit. Some of the creditors of the Bauman Iron Works have filed exceptions to the auditor’s findings and awards in their respective claims, and these, after argument, are before us for determination.

Coco Metalcraft Corporation excepts to the auditor’s disallowance of a claim of $245.56. This claim is for an unpaid balance on an account, arising out of a contract between the Bauman Iron Works and the exceptant. Under the contract claimant, as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Merrill v. National Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Miller's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  3. United States Brick Co. v. Middletown Shale Brick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  4. Fulton's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Patten's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API