United States Brick Co. v. Middletown Shale Brick Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeals, Nos. 359, Jan. T., 1909, and No. 360, Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiffs, Irom orders of C. P. Berks Co., Feb. T., 1909, Nos. 54 and 55, discharging rules for judgments for want of sufficient affidavits of defense in cases of United States Brick Company to use of Robert Pennington, Receiver, v. Middle-town Shale Brick Company and United States Brick Company to use of Robert Pennington, Receiver, v. Reading Shale Brick Company.
Read the full summary
Appeals, Nos. 359, Jan. T., 1909, and No. 360, Jan. T., 1909, by plaintiffs, Irom orders of C. P. Berks Co., Feb. T., 1909, Nos. 54 and 55, discharging rules for judgments for want of sufficient affidavits of defense in cases of United States Brick Company to use of Robert Pennington, Receiver, v. Middle-town Shale Brick Company and United States Brick Company to use of Robert Pennington, Receiver, v. Reading Shale Brick Company. Assumpsit by a receiver to collect, an indebtedness due an insolvent corporation. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. Endlich, P. J.,…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
These appeals involve the same question and were argued together. The judgments are affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned president judge of the common pleas, discharging the rule for judgment in No. 359.
2Cited by16 opinions
- Brothers v. Girard National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Hillcrest Foundation, Inc. v. McFeatersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- O'Neil v. BurnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Gordon v. Anthracite Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- In Re Pressed Steel Car Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.