Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Peter Monsanto

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 1, 1988No. 436, Docket 87-1397Published

1Dissent

MAHONEY, Circuit Judge,

with whom Judges CARDAMONE and PIERCE join except as to Section D of this opinion, dissenting:

I respectfully dissent, and would decide the in banc appeal in accordance with the majority opinion in the original panel determination reported at 836 F.2d 74 (2d Cir. 1987), familiarity with which is assumed. The case is here on appeal from denial of a motion to vacate or modify a post-indictment restraining order (1) to permit appellant Peter Monsanto to use restrained assets to retain private trial counsel, and (2) to exempt legal fees paid to such counsel from post-trial…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. John GrammatikosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Clarence Jay Crozier, Manuel Isadore Pine, Alan Terry Stein, and Florence Margaret WolkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API