Legal Opinion
Laminack v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 11, 1936No. 25803PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. Where one has stolen an automobile and is transporting it away from where it was stolen, another person who, knowing that tile oar has been stolen, assists the thief in the asportation of the stolen property, is guilty as a principal in the offense committed. Green v. State, 114 Ga. 918 (3) (41 S. E. 55); Conner v. State, 25 Ga. 515 (5), 521, 522 (71 Am. D. 184); Brown v. State, 7 Okl. Cr. 678 (126 Pac. 263, 265); Devine v. State, 132 Miss. 492 (96 So. 696); Good v. State, 21 Okl. Cr. 328 (207 Pac. 565, 29 A. L. R. 1029, 1031); Moeller v. People, 70 Colo. 223 (11) (199 Pac. 414) ; State v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Conner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Good v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
- Moeller v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Walter J. Barlow, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Dye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948