Legal Opinion

Tate v. Baugh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 17, 1927No. 16970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

Th’e parties will be herein referred to as they appeared in the district court.

J. F. Baugh and Lou Baugh, defendants, executed their promissory note, and mortgage to secure the same, on certain real estate located in Pontotoc county to the Conservative Loan Company. The Conservative-Loan Company assigned the note and mortgage to H. W. Tate, plaintiff, who filed his action in the district court of Pontotoc county, alleging that there was default in the interest payments due on th'e note and elected to declare the whole amount due and prayed for judgment on the note and foreclosure of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dandois v. RainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Walker v. BeveridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Schoonover v. BeveridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Winnebago State Bank v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Sherrill v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Hoffman Bros. v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co. v. PoulterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API