Chambless v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
A jury found appellant, Ronald Eugene Chambless, guilty of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. See Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 31.07(a) (Vernon 1989). Two prior felony offenses were alleged in the indictment for enhancement purposes. The jury assessed as punishment eighty-five years in the Texas Department of Corrections. We affirm.
Appellant, in points of error one, two and six, contends that the indictment is defective because of certain errors in the enhancement allegations. By point one, he argues that the indictment fails to allege that he had been twice before…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Parent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Lynch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Steadman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Clark v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Antonio Jenkins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2017
- Clark v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Hubert Lee Steadman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.