Legal Opinion

U. S. Life Ins. Co. v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 8, 1951No. 2946PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, Justice.

Appellee sued appellants for the recovery of an indefinite sum alleged to be due him as salary and commissions under a contract of employment, for an attorney’s fee incurred in the prosecution of such claim, and for compensatory damages on account of the unauthorized use of his signature and name by appellants in the promotion of their business. Appellants answered with an admission that they owed appellee $170.51 as salary and commissions, alleging that they had tendered that sum to him, and they again offered in their pleadings to pay him that amount. For further answer,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Washington Fidelity Nat. Ins. Co. v. WilliamsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Sabine & E. T. R'y Co. v. JoachimiTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. WannTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. O'Brien v. Pabst Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. Reaugh v. McCollum Exploration Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Huff v. Fidelity Union Life Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Government Personnel Mutual Life Insurance v. WearTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Brinkley v. CasablancasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Hazlitt v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
  5. Kirkwood & Morgan, Inc. v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API