Legal Opinion
Bose Corp. v. LIGHTSPEED AVIATION, INC.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 4, 2010No. Civil Action 09-10222-WGYPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff Bose Corporation (“Bose”) brought an action against the defendant Lightspeed Aviation, Inc. (“Lightspeed”) for patent infringement, claiming that Lightspeed’s sales of its Zulu ANR Aviation headset (the “Zulu headset”) infringed upon Bose-owned U.S. Patent No. 5,181,-252, entitled “High Compliance Headphone Driving” (the “'252 patent”). Lightspeed filed a counterclaim against Bose, alleging that Bose breached an agreement executed between the two parties to resolve a prior lawsuit. Subsequently, Lightspeed amended its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Rodriguez-Ortiz v. Margo Caribe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Norman Knight v. Mark J. Mills, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- PerSeptive Biosystems, Inc. v. Pharmacia Biotech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dubliner, Inc. v. East Coast Tavern Group, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023