Legal Opinion

Van Rensselaer v. Brice

New York Court of Chancery

Decided August 6, 1833PublishedCited by 10 opinions

This cause came before the court upon exceptions to a master’s report, allowing certain exceptions taken by the complainant to the defendant’s answer for impertinence. The bill was filed for the purpose of restraining the defendant from cutting wood upon certain lands, in the manor of Rensselaerwyck, which were alleged to belong to the complainant.

Read the full summary

This cause came before the court upon exceptions to a master’s report, allowing certain exceptions taken by the complainant to the defendant’s answer for impertinence. The bill was filed for the purpose of restraining the defendant from cutting wood upon certain lands, in the manor of Rensselaerwyck, which were alleged to belong to the complainant. The defence set up by the answer of the defendant was, that the lot upon which he had cut and was continuing to cut wood at the time of the filing of the complainant’s bill, was a part of the common lands of the manor. That such lot had been…

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

For the purpose of determining whether those parts of the answer to which these exceptions relate are impertinent, the part of the answer which charges the conveyance to the complainant to be fraudulent as against the defendant’s claim to estovers, as well as every other part of the answer, must be taken as true. And each exception should have been overruled, if any part of the answer embraced in such exception was pertinent, or necessary to the defence of the defendant. An exception for impertinence must be "supported in toto ; and if it include any passage which is not…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bush v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  2. John D. Park & Sons Co. v. National Wholesale Druggists' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Curtis v. MastenNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
  4. Goodrich v. RodneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1854
  5. Wilmington & W. R. v. Board of Railroad Com'rsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API