Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. Pacific Hide and Fur Depot

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1989No. 84-437PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

F. Clifford Hobbs sued Pacific Hide and Fur Depot for his claimed wrongful discharge from employment in the District Court, Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County. His theories of recovery, which were submitted to the jury, included actual fraud, constructive fraud, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and negligent misrepresentation. The jury verdict found against Hobbs on all of the theories of recovery, and, judgment having been rendered thereon in favor of the .defendant, Hobbs appealed from the judgment to this Court. We reverse and remand for new trial as to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gates v. Life of Montana InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Nicholson v. United Pacific InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Dare v. Montana Petroleum Marketing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Gates v. Life of Montana InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Crenshaw v. Bozeman Deaconess HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Buck v. Billings Montana Chevrolet, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kestell v. Heritage Health Care Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re the Estate of HarmonMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Bartlett v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Cecil v. Cardinal Drilling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API