Legal Opinion

Duque v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 2, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In a personal injury action predicated upon medical malpractice, the defendants separately appeal, as limited by their briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Santucci, J.), dated February 24, 1988, as upon reargument, "resettled” a prior order of the same court, dated October 26, 1987, made upon the plaintiffs default, by granting the defendants’ respective motions to dismiss the complaint due to the plaintiffs failure to comply with a March 23, 1987 discovery order only if the plaintiff failed to comply with that order within 30 days from the date of service…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fiore v. GalangNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Rodney v. New York Pyrotechnic Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Amendolare v. PiontkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Yunger v. YungerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. William P. Pahl Equipment Corp. v. KassisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. George v. SasticAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Atlas Door Corp. v. Barline Contracting Crane Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API