Legal Opinion

Spurlock v. J. T. Knight & Son

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 1945No. 4 Div. 318PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

As a result of a change in appellate procedure, certain preliminary questions of unusual interest to the bench and bar, and presented by this record, were decided and' reported near the end of the last term, without a decision on the merits of the-case. See 18 So.2d 685 1 and Blair v.. Greene, Ala.Sup., 18 So.2d 688. 2 We now proceed to dispose of the cause on the-merits.

As stated on former appeal, Spurlock v. J. T. Knight & Son, 244 Ala. 364, 13 So.2d 396:

“The one count of' the .complaint claims; damages for the breach of a written contract between the parties.
“To the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blair v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Spurlock v. J. T. Knight & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Spurlock v. J. T. Knight & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hornaday v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Shelley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Harris v. DialSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Almon v. Commission of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. Hornaday v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API