Legal Opinion

State v. Coustenis

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided September 12, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUILLEN, Judge.

This is the decision on defendant Cous-tenis’ Motion To Suppress evidence prior to trial in the Superior Court.

The defendant was apprehended by Trooper J. Jerry Marvel based on information relayed by radio from Corporal George Dick that the radar equipment being used by the latter had indicated defendant’s vehicle as traveling at a speed of 46 m. p. h. in a 35 m. p. h. speed zone. The Court will as sume, as does the letter of the Attorney General, that the apprehending officer Marvel had the motor vehicle in view at the time it was determined by radar that the speed limit was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Halko v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  2. State v. CookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Commonwealth v. McDermottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  4. State v. MoffittSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WarrenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State v. MarquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State of Delaware v. Niyala.Superior Court of Delaware · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API