Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Dunn

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1891No. 6562PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought to recover damages for an injury received by Mrs. Dunn, which it may be conceded resulted from negligence of those in charge of a locomotive engaged in the transportation of material for the construction of the present State capitol.

After Taylor became the contractor to build the capitol he asked permission from the city council of the city of Austin to construct a railway on and over certain streets connecting the capitol site with the railways entering the city. Such a connection by rail seems to have been almost indispensable for the transportation of material…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  2. Water Co. v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. McPherson v. Foster Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Becker v. Keokuk WaterworksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Greene v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Huston v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Freigy v. Gargaro Company, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Ex Parte SullivanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. San Antonio Traction Co. v. AltgeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API