Legal Opinion
Murdock v. Fishel
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 10, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District. Action by Francis A. Murdock, individually and as agent for Lewis C. Murdock, and others, against Aaron A, Fishel, individually and as surviving partner of the firm of Fishel, Adler & Schwartz, and others. From an order denying relief, plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSeabury, J.
On November 14, 1902, the landlord entered into a lease in writing with Aaron A. Fishel and Abraham I. Adler, composing the firm of Fishel, Adler & Schwartz, for a term therein described hs follows: ' ' 1
“To" have and to hold the same unto the parties of the second part from the 1st day of January, 1903, for and during the term of 21 years -and 4 months thence next ensuing, and pay therefor unto the said parties of the first part, their heirs or assigns^ yearly and each year during said term, from and after the 1st day of May, 1903, the rent of sum of $12,500, to be paid in equal monthly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Collins v. . HasbrouckNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Post v. . KearneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Lynde v. HoughNew York Supreme Court · 1857
- Fleming v. RyanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- Columbia Bank v. ClarkeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davidson v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Gay v. FockeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923