Legal Opinion

Gay v. Focke

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 20, 1923No. 3989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). We pass extended notice of questions of practice presented by appellees by saying that while in the first decision of the Supreme Court of the territory the court, in a sense, determined the law applicable to the Mokuleia leasehold, still the decree was not final or appealable, and ,no decree was made which became final in form until after the second appeal. Rumsey v. New York Life Ins. Co. (C. C. A.) 267 Fed. 554. We therefore consider appellants’ main assignments of error as presenting for consideration the questions: (1) Whether the net rents or part of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . LittlefieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Guarantee Co. of North America v. Phenix Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  3. Hobson v. . HaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Barber v. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Adams v. CowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Waialua Agr. Co. v. ChristianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  2. Rauer v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  3. Whitcomb v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API