Hutter v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Presiding Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction for molestation of his 12-year-old stepdaughter. Held:
1. During voir dire of the jury the trial judge limited the defense examination of the jurors to the entire panel instead of to individual jurors. This is reversible error. Under OCGA § 15-12-133 (Code Ann. § 59-705) a defendant is entitled to individual voir dire of each juror, and Blount v. State, 214 Ga. 433 (3) (105 SE2d 304), held that it was reversible error to deny a criminal defendant the right to individual examination of each juror prior to imposing a challenge. Accord,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gilreath v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Blankenship v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Blount v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Hart v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- State v. HutterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Grayer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Faircloth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.