Legal Opinion

Norris v. Wittig

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1942PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

. Martin, J.

The' parties are farmers. Defendants deal in full-bred cattle. On May 26, 1939, plaintiff bought a certain bull from defendants and paid therefor $325. The bull was born November 9, 1938. It was a registered, purebred Holstein, and was bought for breeding purposes. Defendants admit that they warranted and guaranteed said bull to be a breeder and suitable for breeding purposes. In January, 1940, plaintiff started to use him for breeding. He was tried on several cows without success. Plaintiff then informed defendants that the bull was a nonbreeder and received permission from…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Klueter v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Jeff Davis County v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. State v. StaubSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  4. Pinkerton v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  5. Tuggle v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lange v. AndrusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API