Legal Opinion

State v. Jose Luis Cortez

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided November 18, 2015No. 07-15-00196-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Brian Quinn, Chief Justice

At the suppression hearing, the trooper was asked: “So you’re telling the Court that because you see a van, it’s clean and it’s got two people in it, that [sic] was indicators of potential criminal activity for you?” The trooper answered: “Yes, sir, they are. They — in and of themselves are nothing, but in the total — when you start adding them all together, they can be.” When two people in • a clean, car indicate criminal activity then the words of John Lennon have come to fruition ... “Strange days indeed — most peculiar, mama.” 1

Nonetheless, the foregoing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. IduarteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Abney, Rickey DewayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Robinson, Timothy LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. State v. Tarvin, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  5. Jaganathan, Francheska v.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CortezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  2. State v. CortezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Joseph B. Wiggins v. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  4. Joseph B. Wiggins v. Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  5. Sammy Banegas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API