Legal Opinion

Hermance v. Weisner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1938PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed May 17, 1938:

Wickhem, J.

Plaintiff makes two contentions upon this appeal: (1) That the statute of limitations has cut off all rights of defendant to enforce the two mortgages which she paid off upon the premises in question, and with respect to which except for the statute of limitations she would have succeeded by subrogation to the rights of the mortgagees; and (2) that defendant is not entitled to a lien for improvements without accounting for rents and profits received by her during the term of her possession from 1901 *504to date. In view of the nature of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Charmley v. CharmleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. McLaughlin v. Estate of CurtsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Stewart v. StewartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Connell v. WelchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. New York Casualty Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Jezo v. JezoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Lawrence v. HarveyMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Eloff v. RieschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Meckler v. WeissSupreme Court of Florida · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API