Legal Opinion

Friedman v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 19, 1959No. 63302; protests 58/7720, etc. (Philadelphia)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The suits listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, challenge the action of the collector of customs in classifying certain nonelectric dry shavers as “Machines, not specially provided for, finished or unfinished; * * * Other,” and assessing duty thereon at the rate of 13% per centum ad valorem or 13 per centum ad valorem, depending upon the date of entry, under the provisions of paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, or the Sixth Protocol of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API