Legal Opinion

Friedman v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 24, 1958No. C. D. 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Laweence, Judge:

An importation of so-called “Non-Electric Dry-Shavers” was classified by the collector of customs as machines, not specially provided for, in paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 372), as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T. D. 54108, and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 13 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff claims that said articles should be classified as “Safety razors” in paragraph 358 of said act (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 358), as modified, supra,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. British Industries Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commercial Adolfo S. Pagan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API