Madalyn Murray O'Hair v. Thomas O. Paine
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Mrs. O’Hair and others appeal from the District Court’s dismissal of her complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 1 We affirm.
Having reviewed the record and construing the complaint in the light most favorable to Mrs. O’Hair, we concur in the District Court’s finding: she has stated no claim which would entitle her to relief. See Conley v. Gibson, 1957, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80; Delaware Valley Conservation Ass’n v. Resor, 3 Cir. 1968, 392 F.2d 331, 335-336, cert denied, 393 U.S. 915, 89 S.Ct. 239, 21 L.Ed.2d 200; Pauling v. McElroy, 1960,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Zorach v. ClausonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Madalyn Murray O'Hair v. Thomas O. PaineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970