Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 27, 2017No. 64/15Published

1Opinion of the Court

Terrance J. Brown v. State of Maryland, No. 64, September Term, 2015. Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — FIFTH AMENDMENT — ENTITLEMENT TO MIRANDA WARNINGS — DETERMINATION OF CUSTODY FOR PURPOSES OF MIRANDA: The Court of Appeals determined Petitioner was in custody for Miranda purposes when: (1) Petitioner was approached by detective during early morning hours at the hospital where Petitioner was being treated for multiple gunshot wounds; (2) detective told Petitioner that detective’s purpose in coming to the hospital was to “obtain” Petitioner; (3) detective transported Petitioner…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API