Legal Opinion
Basile v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 26, 1985No. Nos. C-1-82-740, C-1-82-748, C-1-82-774, C-1-82-857, C-1-82-1012 and C-1-83-1591PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPIEGEL, District Judge:
This matter is before the Court for consideration of plaintiffs’ motion to certify this ease as a class action (doc. 47). Defendant Merrill Lynch filed a memorandum in opposition to the motion (doc. 64). For reasons that need not be detailed here, the hearing and decision on this matter were postponed a number of times. Plaintiffs filed a supplemental memorandum in support of their motion (doc. 140). The matter came on for a hearing in August of 1984 (doc. 175). Following the hearing, at the Court’s request, plaintiffs filed a post hearing memorandum in support of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Dorothy Weathers v. Peters Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Riordan v. BarneyDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1986
- Boggs v. Divested Atomic Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Bowling v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
- Swigart v. Fifth Third BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.