Legal Opinion
United States v. Reginald Loera
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1991No. 89-10429PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
Reginald Loera appeals from his conviction for assault resulting in serious bodily injury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(f). Loera contends that there was insufficient evidence to establish the required element of willfulness. He further contends that evidence of his prior convictions was improperly admitted into evidence. We disagree and affirm.
I
Facts
On October 18, 1988, Reginald Loera was indicted on one count of second-degree murder and one count of assault resulting in serious bodily injury." The offenses occurred on the Fort Mohave Indian Reservation, Arizona.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. John Paul WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, and v. The Greyhound Corporation and Greyhound Lines, Inc., AndCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Hopt v. PeopleSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. Robert FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States v. TanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Warren James BlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Donovan NewCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. PettigrewCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. CalbatCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.