Legal Opinion

Lichter v. 349 Amsterdam Avenue Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered November 18, 2003, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, denied defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment and for dismissal of the complaint on unspecified grounds, and directed an inquest as to damages, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

There are no factual issues with respect to defendant’s responsibility to maintain its chimney. Any responsibility that plaintiff may have had at one time, pursuant to section 27-860 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, as the neighboring owner of a taller,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Savarese v. ShatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Dabb v. NYNEX Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Congregation B'nai Jehuda v. Hiyee Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Great Jones Studios Inc. v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Great Jones Studios Inc. v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API