Legal Opinion
HOLLYWOOD v. MARR
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 28, 2024No. 2:22-cv-02270Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AROGANT HOLLYWOOD, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION : NO. 22-2270 CHRISTOPHER PAUL MARR, JOEL D. : KEATON, CUBESMART LP, and : TIMOTHY M. MARTIN, : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Scott, J. March 28, 2024 In this action brought under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12182, and for retaliation for the exercise of ADA rights in violation of Title IV of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12203(b), plaintiff Arogant Hollywood, proceeding pro se, alleges that defendant CubeSmart, the owner of a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.