Legal Opinion

Culbreth v. . Downing

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1897PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Civil action for damages for ponding water on land, tried before Coble, J., at April Term, 1897, of Cumberland-Superior Court. On the trial his Honor intimated that the action was barred and plaintiff submitted to a non-suit and appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Faircloth, C. J.:

This action was instituted to recover damages for ponding water on plaintiff's land by reason of obstruction in a ditch running through defendant’s land, which ditch had for a long time carried off such water. It was-admitted that the obstructions were in the ditch in March, 1892. On March 8, 1895, the Legislature enacted Act 1895, Chapter 165, that The Code, Sec. 155(3) be amended by adding, “And when the trespass is a continuing one, such action shall be commenced within three years from the original trespass, and not thereafter.” His Honor intimated that the action was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Parker v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Michael Dwayne Brown v. Ronald Angelone, Jesse James Pritchard, Jr. v. Ronald Angelone, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Romeo Trinidad Flores, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. Fields v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Miller v. FallonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
  5. Milbourne v. KelleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API