Legal Opinion

Eidenmiller v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1930No. 27665PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

-This is a case under the employers’ liability law. Ray Eidenmiller secured a judgment for compensation against the department of public works of the state of Nebraska. Defendant appealed. Eidenmiller cross-appealed because of the refusal of the court to allow the claimed balance on his doctor’s bill.

On October 29, 1926, in Holt county, while appellee was employed under appellant, he was injured by the premature explosion of dynamite used in the construction of the public highway on which he was working. The parties agree that it arose out of and in the course of his employment, that he was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gaines v. WarrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Nebraska National Guard v. MorganNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  3. McShane v. MurrayNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Adams v. Guthrie & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  5. First Bank of Ulysses v. WarrenNebraska Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Offutt Housing Company v. County of SarpyNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Anstine v. State, Department of Banking & Receivership DivisionNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. In Re Request for Opinion of the Supreme Court Relative to Constitutionality of SDLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Pointer v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. NordhuesNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API