Legal Opinion
Lazuran v. Kemp
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided May 30, 1991No. C90-894RPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
ROTHSTEIN, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the court on plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend her complaint. Having reviewed the matter, together with all documents filed in support and in opposition, and being fully advised, the court finds and rules as follows:
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In November 1984, plaintiff Catherine Lazuran, a Caucasian female, applied for a trial attorney position in the Seattle District Office of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). At the time, Ms. Lazuran held an identical position in the EEOC’s Los Angeles…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Hiram WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Steven OUBICHON, Appellant, v. NORTH AMERICAN ROCKWELL CORPORATION, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Gunvant D. SHAH, Appellant, v. MT. ZION HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, a Non-Profit Corporation, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alonzo v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Ivey v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Khan v. RicheyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- McDonald v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2002
- Peter Maingi v. 92-4101-Des Ibp, Inc., and Its RepresentativesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993