Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Holland

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 3, 1989No. Record 860660PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarrico, C.J.

In the court below, Raleigh Paris Holland, Jr. (Paris), filed a bill of complaint seeking to have himself declared “the legitimate and sole heir” of Raleigh Paris Holland (Holland), who died intestate owning a 77.25-acre tract of land in Henry County. Mae Holland Murphy (Murphy), Holland’s sister, was named defendant, and she filed an answer in which she claimed ownership of the land. Murphy also filed a plea of laches.

After an ore tenus hearing, the trial court overruled Murphy’s plea of laches and held that Paris was Holland’s legitimate son, entitled to inherit his father’s entire estate.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Offield v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  2. Morris v. MosbySupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  3. McClaugherty v. McClaughertySupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  4. Shirley v. Van EverySupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  5. William C. Grove, Sr., and Rozalia Miller, Administratrix of the Estate of William C. Grove, Jr., Deceased v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Ass'n v. Group Hospitalization & Medical Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
  2. Belton v. CrudupSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  3. Arlington County v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  4. Arlington County v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  5. Billie Paxton Einselen v. Peter C. EinselenCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API