Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Arlington County v. White

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 21, 2000No. Record 991374Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

JUSTICE HASSELL,

with whom CHIEF JUSTICE CARRICO and

SENIOR JUSTICE COMPTON join, dissenting in part, and concurring in judgment.

I

I dissent because the majority ignores the fundamental issue raised in this appeal: Does Arlington County have the legal authority to recognize common law marriages or “same-sex unions” by conferring certain health insurance benefits upon domestic partners of County employees who are engaged in these relationships? Even though a review of the briefs and record filed in this appeal demonstrates that this question is the primary issue raised in this appeal, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. County Board of Arlington CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  2. City of Richmond v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  3. City of Richmond v. Confrere Club of Richmond, Virginia, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  4. Bd. of Sup'rs of Fairfax Cty. v. HorneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  5. Tidewater Ass'n of Homebuilders, Inc. v. City of Virginia BeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API