Legal Opinion
Russell v. Buchanan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided May 19, 1998No. COA97-1001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Mark D., Judge.
Defendants appeal from judgment and order of the trial court awarding plaintiff damages for sexual harassment. Plaintiff appeals from order of the trial court denying attorneys’ fees.
Sherry G. Russell (plaintiff} was employed by Carolina Machine & Associates (CMA) and Jerry Buchanan (Buchanan), president and major shareholder (collectively defendants), from 7 June 1993 to 25 June 1993. Plaintiff testified that during her time with the company plaintiff was constantly subjected to sexual harassment by Buchanan, including statements that he would make her a vice-president…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Weil v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Bumgarner v. ReneauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Young v. KenleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Guthrie v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Tomika Investments, Inc. v. MacEdonia True Vine Pentecostal Holiness Church of God, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Walker v. TOWN OF STONEVILLECourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Whitt v. Harris Teeter, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- King v. OwenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.