Tomika Investments, Inc. v. MacEdonia True Vine Pentecostal Holiness Church of God, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Judge.
Defendant raises three questions on appeal: (I) whether the trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment on defendant’s claim that the deed to its property was void; (II) whether the trial court erred during the trial of this matter in refusing to allow evidence that could have been used to establish the value of defendant’s property; and (III) whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
I
Plaintiff Tomika agrees that its proper corporate name was at all times relevant hereto “Tomika Investment Company,”…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- In Re the Will of BuckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Smith v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hudgins v. WagonerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Whitaker v. AkersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Kearns v. HorsleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Morris v. Scenera Research, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Brissett v. First Mount Vernon Industrial Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.