Legal Opinion

Tomika Investments, Inc. v. MacEdonia True Vine Pentecostal Holiness Church of God, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 2000No. COA98-1387PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

Defendant raises three questions on appeal: (I) whether the trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment on defendant’s claim that the deed to its property was void; (II) whether the trial court erred during the trial of this matter in refusing to allow evidence that could have been used to establish the value of defendant’s property; and (III) whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

I

Plaintiff Tomika agrees that its proper corporate name was at all times relevant hereto “Tomika Investment Company,”…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. In Re the Will of BuckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Smith v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Hudgins v. WagonerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Whitaker v. AkersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Kearns v. HorsleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Morris v. Scenera Research, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. Brissett v. First Mount Vernon Industrial Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API