Legal Opinion
Bjornstad v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery LLC
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 1, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01708Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT SEATTLE 6 ANTHONY BJORNSTAD, 7 Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:19-cv-01708-RAJ-BAT 8 v. PROTECTIVE ORDER 9 ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY LLC, et al., 10 Defendant. 11 Before the Court is the Motion for Protective Order of Defendants Ethicon Endo-Surgery, 12 Inc. and Ethicon Endo-Surgery LLC (“Ethicon”). Dkt. 34. Following a telephonic hearing on 13 October 20, 2020, Plaintiff Anthony Bjornstad filed his response (Dkt. 41) and Ethicon filed its 14 reply (Dkt. 42). Based on a review of the parties’ filings and this Court’s model protective…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Fitzpatrick v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Phillips v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. InnamoratiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.