Legal Opinion

State v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1975No. 742SC919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Defendant first assigns error to denial of his motion to quash the indictments made on the ground that they were “too vague and insufficient, too broad and general.” The bills of indictment contained allegations sufficient to set forth fully and clearly all essential elements of the offenses charged. The words, “with force and arms,” included in each bill, constitute a formal phrase traditionally included in bills of indictment and have no significance as an element of the specific crimes charged. State v. Acrey, 262 N.C. 90, 136 S.E. 2d 201 (1964). Defendant’s first assignment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DeesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. AcreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State v. WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HugginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. SergakisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API