Legal Opinion

United States v. Archibald McNeil & Sons Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 2, 1925No. 444PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

Seeking to recover $17,422.32 as compensation for 3,840.9 tons of bituminous coal, defendant in error, a Connecticut corporation, instituted this action against the United States by filing statement of claim in the United. States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

It alleged—

That jurisdiction of the action arises under the Fifth Amendment and the tenth section of the Lever Act, c. 53, 40 Stat. 276, 279.

That the-coal in question had been shipped from, the mines under valid contracts during the first part of October, 1919, was owned by the claimant, and prior to October 30, 1919,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Insurance Co. v. FolsomSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Law v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Houston Coal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Twist v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Utah Fuel Co. v. National Bituminous Coal Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. United States v. White Oak Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
  4. Davis v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Flanagan v. BensonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API