Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided January 6, 2009No. 07-0900/MCPublished

1DissentBaker, Judge

Introduction

Today the Court reverses more than fifty years of military justice precedent and practice based on Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007), a Supreme Court case addressing the time for appeals under the federal habeas statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2107 (2000). In Bowles, the Court concluded that “the taking of an appeal within the prescribed time is ‘mandatory and jurisdictional’ ” and that 28 U.S.C. § 2107(c) prescribed such a time limit based on the text of the statute. 127 S.Ct. at 2363 (citation omitted). However, in applying Bowles to this Court’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API