Legal Opinion
Greenidge v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided August 5, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.
In this action by the plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries and by the plaintiff husband to recover for the loss of his wife’s services, the defendant has had a verdict.
Upon the rendition of the verdict, the plaintiffs moved to set it aside on the ground of alleged errors in my charge to the jury.
To make the point at issue understandable, a short recitation of the facts is necessary.
The plaintiff wife (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) testified that she and her brother went to defendant’s supermarket to do some shopping and about 15 or 20 minutes after she entered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kellegher v. Forty-Second Street, Manhattanville & St. Nicholas Avenue RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Pignatelli v. Gimbel Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Pignatelli v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Bosler v. Steiden Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Sikora v. Apex Beverage Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scott v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1957
- Millheiser v. Smilen Bros.City of New York Municipal Court · 1959
- Perito v. Sunrise Supermarket Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1961