Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Perito v. Sunrise Supermarket Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 6, 1961Published

1ConcurrenceWalter B. Hart, J.

I concur in the reversal directed by the majority but would go furthér and dismiss the complaint for failure of proof. In my opinion there was not even a scintilla of evidence of negligence on defendant’s part. The reasoning of the majority that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur governs in the situation. here present is unacceptable. The material facts are as follows:

Plaintiff, a housewife, went to the self-service supermarket operated by defendant Sunrise at East Meadow on Friday, September 5,1958 at 1:00 p.m. for the purpose of doing her week-end shopping. She had been there for about 20…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Galbraith v. BuschNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Hart v. Emery-Bird-Thayer Dry Goods Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Mercatante v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. Monroe v. HG Hill StoresLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API