United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Kanodia
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BURROUGHS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
The United States Department of Justice (“government”) has moved to inter*480vene in this action for the limited purpose of moving for a stay of discovery pending the conclusion of parallel criminal proceedings (Docket No. 52). For the reasons set forth below, the government’s motion to intervene is ALLOWED. The government’s motion to stay discovery is DENIED, except that (1) the depositions of Defendant Amit Kanodia (“Mr. Kanodia”) and the individual identified in the Complaint as “Tippee 1” are stayed until further order of this Court,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ellis Campbell, Jr., District Director of Internal Revenue v. J. M. Eastland and Montez EastlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. NicholasDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SaadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Oakford Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. NowakDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Galvan v. MnuchinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Lisa Lujan et al. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a District of Columbia Corporation, as Receiver for First National Bank of Lindsay, Oklahoma, et al.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026
- New England Sports Network, L.P. v. Alley Interactive LLC (CT)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
- SEA SALT LLC v. BELLEROSEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.