Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Hull
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 9, 1998PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
This is an appeal of a judgment of sentence for violation of Pennsylvania’s helmet law, 75 Pa.C.S. § 3525(a).
Appellant Dwayne R. Hull was stopped by a Pennsylvania State Police Officer on July 4, 1996. Appellant, who was operating a motorcycle, was charged with violating 75 Pa.C.S. § 3525(a) because his helmet did not conform to the standards promulgated by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) in 67 Pa.Code §§ 107.5(d) and (f). Appellant appeals his conviction of this summary offense, claiming that 75 Pa.C.S. § 3525 is unconstitutionally vague.
In…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BarudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. BasemoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. VukmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Regis Insurance v. All American Rathskeller, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- State v. EckbladWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Civan, E. v. Windermere Farms, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. BrubakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.