Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 25, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 68-361PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUMBAULD, District Judge.
This action was instituted by the Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company (“P. & L. E.”) and Pennsylvania New York Central (“Penn Central”) to set aside a report dated February 21, 1967, and an order issued pursuant thereto dated February 23, 1968, by the Interstate Commerce Commission authorizing the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company (“C. & 0.”) and the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (“B. & 0.”) to acquire control of Western Maryland Railroad Company (“W. M.”) through ownership of capital stock. The City of Hagerstown intervened as a party-plaintiff, and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pittsburgh & New England Trucking Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Railway Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1974
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Jaeger v. StephensDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1971
- Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.