Legal Opinion

St. Johns & Halifax Railroad v. Shalley

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1894PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, J.:

Andrew Shalley, the appellee, sued the appellant railroad company for the recovery of damages for the •destruction of his houses, fences, orange trees and •other property by fire carelessly allowed to escape upon his premises by laborers engaged in the construction of the defendant’s railroad. The cause was referred for trial to a referee, who rendered judgment in .favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $1,805, besides the ■costs taxed at $81.94. Prom this judgment the appeal is taken.

The errors assigned are as follows: 1st. The referee erred in proceeding with the trial of said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huling v. Florida Savings Bank & Real Estate ExchangeSupreme Court of Florida · 1883
  2. Mumby, Stockton & Knight v. Bowden & RosenthalSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  3. Livingston v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1892

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Gulf Refining Co. v. William WilkinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Peairs v. Florida Publishing CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. Frank Herman & Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  5. Green v. SansomSupreme Court of Florida · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API