State v. Hinnant
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Dissent
Judge TYSON, dissenting.
*793The majority's opinion correctly states the controlling statute to set aside a forfeiture, but erroneously concludes the substantial evidence presented by the Bail Agent to support his motion to set aside the forfeiture of an appearance bond, and the trial court's findings of fact thereon, "[were] immaterial because the language found in N.C.G.S. § 15A-544.5(f) is unequivocal." As a result, the majority's opinion concludes 'the trial court lacked authority to set aside the forfeiture 'for any reason.' " The Board of Education failed to present any evidence to support…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Diaz v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Hobbs v. County of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.