Legal Opinion · Dissent

Coppedge v. Coppedge

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 26, 1951Published

1DissentJohnson, J.

It may be conceded that where tbe words “equally” or “share and share alike” are used to indicate an equal division among a class, they ordinarily import a division per capita. Hobbs v. Craige, 23 N.C. 332; Freeman v. Knight, 37 N.C. 72; Hill v. Spruill, 39 N.C. 244; Henderson v. Womack, 41 N.C. 437; Hackney v. Griffin, 59 N.C. 381; Tuttle v. Puitt, 68 N.C. 543; Culp v. Lee, 109 N.C. 675, 14 S.E. 74; Johnston v. Knight, 117 N.C. 122, 23 S.E. 92; Burton v. Cahill, 192 N.C. 505, 135 S.E. 332. See also 57 Am. Jur., Wills, Sec. 1297; Annotations: 16 A.L.R. 15, p. 22; 78 A.L.R. 1385, p. 1389; and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burton v. . CahillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Culp v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Johnston v. . KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. Claude v. SchuttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Freeman v. . KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API